X日报 · AI科技

Introducing ChatGPT Work, a new agent in ChatGPT powered by Codex and GPT-5.6.

It can take action across your apps and files, stay with a project for hours if needed, and turn a goal into finished work.

It’s a whole new way to get work done. https://t.co/uGbvjU1LsV

Introducing ChatGPT Work, a new agent in ChatGPT powered by Codex and GPT-5.6.

It can take action across your apps and files, stay with a project for hours if needed, and turn a goal into finished work.

It’s a whole new way to get work done. https://t.co/uGbvjU1LsV

GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly this Thursday.

We’re expanding preview access globally now. https://t.co/Uk5HcfSc2e

Super to see GPT-5.6 with Work IQ come to Copilot Chat, Cowork, M365 apps, GitHub, and Foundry today.

From multi-step agentic work to analysis and content creation, it brings stronger reasoning and higher-quality outputs without sacrificing efficiency. https://t.co/4AF2Pr48Yq

We stand at a critical crossroads in the debate over AI governance in the United States, and it feels like we are inching closer to a very serious battle over whether or not open source models will even be allowed in an environment where a new de facto licensing regime has been taking shape.

Lacking formal congressional statutory frameworks or clear administration rules (like the diffusion rule revision), we appear to be left with a sporadic, arbitrary, non-transparent process for model review. The fiction of “voluntary” agreements hangs over this debate, and some large model developers are already showing an incredible willingness to bend over backwards to accommodate national security-related officials / orders that the rest of us are not privy to. It's a very opaque process. And those model developers are expected to play ball with those officials, or else their models get pulled from the market or held up for long periods. Or they will lose any government procurement contracts they have. There is nothing “voluntary” about it when that Sword of Damocles hangs in the room.

As this mess worsens, at some point the question of how to handle open source models will come into sharper focus because it will have to. I've even heard some rumors lately that something may be coming from the admin on this front to address this.

Needless to say, if this informal new AI model review regime expands and takes on more pre-vetting characteristics / requirements, it is hard to see how open source players could comply with such quasi-licensing of AI models. Specifically, if this ambiguous new regime is accompanied by a general presumption of ‘restrict-until-permitted,’ then that would spell doom for open source. That is a very dark path for our country.

Worse yet, of course, would be a move by national security officials to more directly restrict open source models and capabilities. If that happens, then we would be right back in the thick of a Clipper Chip-like battle along the lines of what we saw in the late 1990s. That is a much darker path for America.

Meanwhile, open source developers have no “golden shares” or other goodies to offer the government to make their problems go away.

Let’s be clear: If our government takes the dark path, it will become the single most important battle over computational freedom of modern times. It is time for people to make a stand in defense of open source before it is too late.