X日报 · 美股

@TheBritLad I used to be bothered about being called a racist.

Now I do not give a flying shit.

Anyone else feel the same?

@cb_doge BREAKING: Elon Musk calls out Ro Khanna as his household wealth reportedly grew from roughly $27–46 million to an estimated $232.7 million.

• 631 million total trade volume across 38,666 trades since entering Congress, most prolific Democratic trader in House history.

• 2022 investigation found 15% overlap between his legislative work and family stock holdings

• Ro Khanna’s AI-focused trades returned +112.1% excess over the S&P 500 from January 2024 through April 2026, far beating Nancy Pelosi’s +38.5% outperformance.

• 143% return on Nvidia shares bought via wife’s trust in Feb 2024, right before CHIPS Act helped double the stock

Ro 'the Robber' Khanna seems to be the most active insider trader in Congress.

@bumbadum14 In a manner of weeks the USAID death toll has went from like 500k to 1M and now 4.5M.

It’s literally another holocaust!

@micsolana no, the DOGE guys did not kill millions of children, and if you have participated in popularizing this disgusting, dehumanizing lie you are going to hell fyi

@JesseKellyDC Now you know why the communists brought in 20 million foreigners as fast as they could when Biden got installed.

@TheRabbitHole A Syrian national was charged with diverting millions in USAID funding to support a terrorist organization https://t.co/7SvDDzfX5t

@KanekoaTheGreat USAID funneled $53 million to EcoHealth Alliance, which funded coronavirus gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

That research likely created COVID-19.

Millions died.

Trillions were lost.

Lives were destroyed.

USAID has a history of being a CIA-front organization.

Former USAID Director John Gilligan admitted the agency was "infiltrated from top to bottom with CIA people," explaining that operatives were embedded throughout USAID's overseas activities.

In 2013, a State Department cable published by WikiLeaks described USAID's strategy in Venezuela as "penetrating Chavez's political base," "dividing Chavismo," and "isolating Chavez internationally."

In 2014, the Associated Press revealed that USAID secretly funded a Twitter-like platform in Cuba designed to build political opposition.

From 2009 to 2019, USAID partnered with EcoHealth Alliance on the PREDICT program, identifying 1,200 new viruses, training 5,000 people, and expanding dozens of research laboratories worldwide.

Then COVID emerged at one of those labs.

In 2022, former EcoHealth Alliance Vice President Andrew Huff alleged that Peter Daszak had ties to the CIA.

In 2023, a CIA whistleblower alleged that agency officials offered incentives to analysts to support a natural-origin assessment and downplay evidence pointing to a lab leak.

The CIA covered up the lab origin of COVID-19 because USAID funding was central to the creation of COVID-19.

@KanekoaTheGreat .@RandPaul Asks Samantha Power: 'Did USAID Fund Coronavirus Research In Wuhan China?'

"Should we be funding the Academy of Military Medical Research in China? ...Some of the research proposals in 2018 were the Wuhan Insitute of Virology asking for money to create a virus with a furin cleavage site. A SARS-like coronavirus with a furin cleavage site. That's exactly what COVID-19 turned out to be.

So we want to know if there were other research proposals you either granted or denied that were in the same vain as creating viruses that could have become COVID-19. We can't tell because you won't give us information... I now have 25 Senators that have sent you a letter, and you aren't responding... You are being dishonest."

@Rothmus The open society and its enemy, Soros.

While he named his Open Society Foundations after Karl Popper’s “The Open Society and Its Enemies,” his project stands as a philosophical inversion of everything Popper defended.

Popper’s open society rested on critical rationalism, the recognition that no one possesses final truth, that institutions must remain open to criticism and piecemeal reform, and that democracy functions as a method for removing rulers without bloodshed.

He rejected historicism, the belief in iron laws of history that justify sacrificing present generations for a utopian future, and warned that such thinking inevitably produces closed, authoritarian societies.

Soros has repurposed the label to advance a grand project of engineered demographic transformation.

Through mass immigration, multiculturalism as official policy, and diversity mandates that prioritize group identity over individual merit and assimilation, his foundations actively dissolve the cultural continuity and social trust that make rational criticism and incremental change possible.

Popper understood that openness requires a stable framework, a shared language of reason, basic cohesion, and institutions citizens feel they collectively own.
Soros treats those foundations as obstacles to be overcome in the name of an abstract, borderless openness.

The concrete results are visible. Parallel societies that operate under different norms, public spaces where debate on the scale and selection of immigration is treated as illegitimate, and the rise of identity based hierarchies that close off dissent in the name of equity.

These are certainly not expansions of the open society, but new forms of closure, tribal in character, enforced through institutional capture rather than overt dictatorship, yet hostile to the very critical spirit Popper placed at the center of civilized life.

Philosophically, Soros replaces Popper’s falsification and humility before reality with a new historicism, the conviction that global multiculturalism and open borders represent inevitable moral progress, and that resistance from actual existing communities constitutes the new enemy.

The machinery funded in the name of openness does not test its own assumptions against evidence, it suppresses the questions.

Those who still value the ideal of an open society should read Popper on their own terms.
They will find that Soros has not extended the open society, but has supplied its most sophisticated contemporary enemies.

@SenRandPaul U.S. taxpayer money, funneled through USAID and NIH, funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. That research likely caused the COVID pandemic that killed millions and cost trillions.

Dr. Fauci personally signed off on these experiments, then lied to Congress about it.

@alx This is the real reason they’re mad at Elon Musk and DOGE for shutting down USAID. https://t.co/Tyw10xBM6J

@PirateWires Saturday, Silicon Valley Congressman Ro Khanna sat down with left-wing podcaster Jennifer Welch — who previously cheered on those celebrating the murder of Charlie Kirk — to discuss the future of “progressive” governance. In a now viral clip, Khanna claimed Elon Musk “possibly sentenced to death” 4.5 million children by dismantling USAID, and demanded he be subpoenaed once Democrats retake power.

The number traces back to a Lancet study published last summer projecting 14 million deaths by 2030 from USAID cuts.

But the study assumes a fake world: one where DOGE’s cuts stay frozen through 2030, where the State Department’s lifesaving waiver doesn’t exist (it does), where Congress never refunds AIDS relief (it did), where two decades of clinics and supply chains vanish the second a grant lapses. It also conveniently ignores some former USAID functions (like funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology).

Meanwhile, NYU statistician Aaron Brown notes the study credits USAID with preventing 11 million more deaths than the entire global mortality decline over two decades.

@planetmaxwell interrogates the claim that Elon and DOGE single-handedly killed millions of children, and explains why Silicon Valley’s congressman is now laundering this as settled fact (when it’s really just propaganda).

Full story 👇

@ImMeme0 Democrats aren’t going after Elon Musk because of “dying children.” They are pissed off that DOGE cut their USAID slush fund used to manipulate information and tilt elections in our country and foreign countries.

Notice the pattern? Since the 2025 USAID cuts, 7 conservative candidates swept presidential elections across Latin America: Ecuador, Bolivia, Honduras, Chile, Costa Rica, Colombia, and Peru. If USAID was still in place, Lula most likely wouldn’t have won in Brazil.

Here, Samantha Power, the former administrator of USAID, proudly highlighted the agency’s role in influencing what she called “strategically important elections” through the Democratic Elections Fund. She also discussed how USAID funded journalists not only to report the news, but also to “fact-check” incoming information.

USAID directed nearly $500 million to the Internews Network, a little-known NGO funded by the U.S. government. The organization worked with 4,291 media outlets, produced 4,799 hours of broadcasts in a single year, reached as many as 778 million people, and trained more than 9,000 journalists by 2023. Internews also supported social media censorship initiatives.

USAID also funded and trained thousands of lawyers, judges, and election workers, conducted polls that questioned election legitimacy, published reports alleging fraud, and participated in overseeing new elections both in the United States and abroad, among many other activities.

On the contrary, Elon Musk and DOGE actually saved millions of children. By cutting USAID influence, they let parents freely reject leftist failures on crime, economy, and socialism at the polls without manipulation.

@Rothmus “We’re here to fuck all the white girls and fuck the government. We’re over here to breed, we are going to take over.”

That’s what one of the Dewsbury grooming gang rapists told his victim.

Not poverty. Not “cultural misunderstanding”. Not random crime by “Asians”.

This was muslim men operating with a clear religious and racial ideology.

White non-Muslim girls were “slags”, “trash”, and “kuffar whores”, fair game for grooming, gang rape, trafficking, and beatings.
Muslim girls were “pure”. White girls deserved it.
Some perpetrators quoted scripture and framed their actions as religiously justified superiority over infidels.

When the government repeatedly sides with the ideological rapists over its own children, when it betrays fathers and communities trying to protect their daughters, don’t act shocked when people lose faith in the system and take matters into their own hands.

This is demographic and cultural conquest.
An existential attack on Britain enabled by the very people sworn to defend it.

The absolutely filthy anti-white, anti-Christian racist Mehdi Hasan calls the Casey report and the whole push for truth “bullshit.”
The rapists’ own words in court and the girls they destroyed say otherwise.

Denial this loud only confirms who’s still protecting the narrative and why.

@Starlink The first @SouthwestAir flight with Starlink has taken off, connecting passengers and crew with reliable, high-speed Wi-Fi from gate to gate 🛰️✈️ https://t.co/Lhg69BvXsd

@ResisttheMS Elon Musk: "I'll tell you a lesson I learned at PayPal. You know who complained the loudest and the quickest and with the most amount of righteous indignation?"

"The fraudsters."
https://t.co/1P5r47tN3T

@cb_doge BREAKING: American Airlines has just confirmed it will begin rolling out Starlink across more than 500 narrowbody aircraft starting early next year. https://t.co/aTSx4to74H